Sunday, August 29, 2010
When will Park Get Into Drive?
REIQ Report
However, the Real Estate Institute of Queensland’s (REIQ) June quarter median house report shows continued tough market conditions with the preliminary number of sales across the state down by about five per cent compared to the previous quarter. Most areas of the state recorded minimal median house price changes over the period."
“Agents have been reporting quieter market conditions since about early April when the string of interest rate increases began to have a negative impact on the market. Uneven economic data is also starting to worry consumers with many buyers currently happy to sit on the fence until a clearer economic picture emerges.”
While sales activity is currently subdued compared to last year, the REIQ June quarter report found property prices in most areas of the state are now on par with what they were two years ago.
“Over the past two years, Queensland’s median house prices have jumped up and down depending on the types of buyers in the market at the time,” REIQ managing director Dan Molloy said.
“Last year, the numbers of first-timers in the market was higher than usual, so correspondingly the median went down given they bought cheaper properties. This year, there has been a return to a more even distribution of first and non-first home buyers in the market so the medians have increased accordingly.
“This change in buyers, and the types of properties selling, has unfortunately given the false impression there has been robust property price growth when prices are now really where they were two years ago.”
Brisbane’s continued population growth has underpinned the capital city’s performance over the past two years with its median house price increasing about 9 per cent to $530,000 for the year ending June 2010.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Ponzi Borrowers
In a bearish note to clients this morning, Morgan Stanley strategist chief strategist Gerard Minack warned Australia's housing "bubble" could be pricked should banks tighten credit or "loss-making" middle-class landlords start to sell.
He argues owner-occupiers are in too much debt and investors are riskily relying on capital gains to repay their loans and interest repayments.
Compounding the problem is "ill-advised policy", such as the government's first home-buyers grant, which has combined to make Australian houses "40 per cent above fair value", Mr Minack says.
"Buying an asset that's over-priced never ends well," he said. "The real return on residential property over the next decade is likely to be negative, in my view."
Off-the-plan disappointments?
- Investment properties to flood market
- Prices set to soften
- Short-term gains unlikely
"PROPERTY investors are targeting off-the-plan apartments hoping for short-term capital gain, with thousands of prospective pre-sale buyers eyeing Sydney projects.
Ray White is reporting a 6 per cent lift in investor buying as shares weaken and with the end last year of the boosted first-home buyer's grant, The Australian reported.
But analyst Michael Matusik predicts investment properties will flood the market in the near term, leading prices to soften.
An Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute report this month said 80 per cent of investors buy for long-term gain, but at least half sell within five years because of cashflow problems or disappointing capital growth. One in four investors sells within 12 months.
Developers in Sydney are reporting strong demand for new residential projects following stamp duty concession by the NSW government this year. ...
Mr Matusik said property prices would not crash, but there would be deflation in values over time.
"In the next decade, we might see very little growth, and if investors keep buying and thinking 'I'm going to make a killing and then move on', they're going to find themselves a little disappointed," he said.
This would be mostly the case in Melbourne, where the market had been strong, he said. In Perth, Brisbane and Adelaide, the trend had already started to occur.
The Australian
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Risks with Off The Plan purchases
- the development not actually starting, as some developers commence selling prior to obtaining development approval from the Council and many developers do not have finance prior to selling
- the development starting late and finishing later than you want (which is not good if you want to move in; but may be good if you are an investor)
- the development finishing earlier than planned (which is not good if you are not ready to move in, or if you are an investor and planned for a later settlement)
- the developer going bankrupt or running into financial difficulties during development, and so cutting corners or having another builder take over
- changes to apartment layout and size, that may be permitted by the contract
- different quality to what you expected
- different views to what you expected
- having no control over the appointment of the onsite manager and caretaker, who could be appointed under a long term contract
- body corporate fees being low for the first year (to attract purchasers) but then increasing dramatically in year two when the body corporate finds out not enough was budgeted
- paying too much for the apartment, especially if the market goes down between contract and completion, or if you are buying something "different" and so can't really determine value when you sign the contract
- not being able to obtain finance when it comes time to settle.
Gold Coast
Macrossan and Soleil growing

A nice photo from Chris Hinds showing Macrossan Residents and Soleil growing, with Skyline to the right, and then Admiralty Quays and Admiralty Towers One.
Goodbye, Glitzy Condo Pitches
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Changes to Lot Entitlements in Queensland
"Now that you are all aware of the Body Corporate and Community Management Amendment Bill 2010 lets spend some time explaining, if passed, what it is going to mean for you.
Open for public consultation until 23rd September 2010 the Bill proposes to outline new concepts and principles for the setting of Contribution Schedule Lot Entitlements (CSLE), along with a provision for lot owners who were disadvantaged by adjustment orders to have the amended CSLE changed back to their original schedule prior to any change. We have provided a brief summary of the main areas of the Bill below but urge anyone who believes they will be affected to review a copy of the Bill at www.deedi.qld.gov.au and make a submission to bccm.policy@deedi.qld.gov.au.
1. Introduction of the following Principles for deciding CSLE:
- Equality Principle -The CSLE must be equal except to the extent which it is just and equitable in the circumstances for them not to be equal.
- Relativity Principle - The CSLE must take into account factors such as the nature, features and characteristics of the lots, the purposes for which the lots are used, how the scheme is structured, the impact the lots may have on the costs of maintaining the common property and the market value of the lots.
- Unimproved Value Principle - Where the CSLE must be proportionate to the unimproved value of the lots.
- Market Value Principle - Interest Schedule Lot Entitlements must reflect the respective market values of the lots, except to the extent which is is just and equitable for the lot entitlements not to reflect the respective market values.
2. Adjustment of CSLE
A Body Corporate is still entitled to change its CSLE by passing a Reolution Without Dissent. The notice of meeting must be accompanied by a written document outlining the changes and the reasons for the changes.
An owner is still able to apply to have the CSLE changed either through Specialist Adjudication or the Queensland Civil & Administrative Tribunal (QCAT), however there are restrictions. For an existing scheme, the scheme must have been affected by a material change since the last time the CSLE were decided. For schemes established after the commencement of the Bill, the owner making the application must believe the CSLE are not consistent with the deciding principle.
3. Previous Decisions
The proposed Bill will allow an owner (who must have been an owner at the time an order was made) to submit a motion to the Body Corporate to revert back to the CSLE before any order to change them was made. There will be a three (3) year time limit for an owner to submit such a motion. If the Body Corporate receives a motion from an owner, it must identify the CSLE pre-adjustment and call a general meeting to allow owners to vote, by Resolution Without Dissent, whether to change the CSLE back to what they were pre-adjustment. Special provisions will apply to Lots that have been subdivided or amalgamated.
4. Applications already made
If an application is being heard by a Specialist Adjudictoar or QCAT and a decision has not been made or has not been given effect at the commencement of the Bill, it will cease to have effect when the Bill commences.
Some other relevant changes proposed include:
- A buyer may terminate a contract if it is entered into but before settlement, a new Community Management Statement (CMS) is recorded and:
- the seller does not give the buyer a copy of the new CMS within 14 days (or longer if agreed by both parties) after the new CMS is recorded; and
- the buyer would be materially prejudiced given the extent to which the new CMS was different to the previous CMS; and
- the buyer gives the seller 14 days notice (or longer if agreed) that they wish to terminate the contract.
- A buyer may terminate a contract if they are buying from the Original Owner for the Scheme if they reasonably believe that the CSLE are inconsistent with the principle on which they were decided and the buyer would be materially prejudiced if they completed the contract. There is a 90 day time limit to terminate after the buyer (or a person acting for the buyer) receives a copy of the contract."
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
UrbanEdge
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Admiralty Precinct
Tips for Apartment Investors
"Many people invest in apartments because they often have a cheaper buy-in price than houses and are also thought to be a lot easier to maintain without gardens to worry about, and with the costs of building maintenance shared across other owners.
But what makes a good investment unit?
Location, location
You can't get past the fact you need to look for an apartment in a good spot. In the city, walking distance to public transport and shops is a must. Nearby schools can be handy but many renters are single or young, childless couples, so a school nearby is probably going to be third on the list after a train or tram station or a very reliable bus route that is here to stay, and shops, cafés and other services. Buyers agents say you should look for a quiet side street rather than a busy main road.
Many renters are professionals who want to get into the city fast. For that reason, apartments closer to town are recommended over those on the outskirts by many buyers agents who argue they will attract higher capital growth. The downside is they often cost more to buy than units further out.
An apartment in an area where there's high development and plenty of other similar flats around would probably grow in value more slowly than an older unit in a pre-1980s building. That's because at sale time there could be stacks of similar new flats on the market but a well-built, well-located older unit will be a scarcer find."
Saturday, August 7, 2010
Friday, August 6, 2010
Mirvac's Hamilton Project
Listed real estate group Mirvac is set to continue its successful track record of quality residential development on Brisbane in-fill sites after the purchase of a prime 7,637-square-metre former Department of Primary Industry site at Hamilton.
Previous projects by Mirvac on classic in-fill sites in Brisbane include The Arbour On Grey (at South Bank), Quay West, Grosvenor, Waterline Bulimba, Park Hill Village, Mariner’s Reach, Cutters Landing and more recently Waterfront Newstead.
Mirvac’s Queensland CEO Matthew Wallace says the Hamilton site, located in Hercules Street, is six kilometres from the CBD and will likely accommodate more than 500 residences. Its end value will be around $300 million.
“We are very excited about the purchase of this site and while our planning is still in its initial stages at present we will be delivering a residential product that will broaden the price segments in which we operate,” he says. “The site is extremely well located and the same team that has delivered such projects as Cutters Landing, Tennyson Reach and more recently Waterfront Newstead will be behind the Hamilton development.
“The product will be affordable, it will be quality, it meets the State Government and city council’s planning goals of higher density in the CBD fringe and will be a prime example of contemporary urban design.” Wallace says the Hamilton development is a prime example of Mirvac’s national strategy to continually review and refine its product offering in line with demand and opportunities that arise.
...
Wallace says the Hamilton development will leverage off the established amenity within the immediate locale and it is proposed that the urban street environment will integrate with the existing Portside development.
The site is adjacent to the Portside Wharf development and cruise ship terminal, is approximately 500 metres to the City Cat, five minutes to the Gateway Motorway and 10 kilometres south of the Brisbane Airport.
The DPI has recently vacated the site.
“We are planning a range of innovative one and two bedroom product on the site and our research indicates that there will be significant demand for this product and this location,” he says.
“Our plan is to provide affordably priced, high-quality residences to a broad section of the marketplace and our team is excited about turning their minds to a new challenge.
...
Wallace says it is expected that approvals permitting, Mirvac will release the first of the residences at Hamilton next year.
See QBR
Alice Street Development by Sunland
The developer of the world's tallest residential tower Q1 on the Gold Coast has unveiled plans to build a $250-million luxury apartment tower in Brisbane's CBD. Sunland Group has lodged its proposal for the 44-storey Carrington Tower opposite the Botanical Gardens at 140 Alice Street, after acquiring a small slice of neighbouring land that currently houses a small apartment building.
The tower - said to be encased with a pewter glass wall with a subtle gold tint - will be built on the site of Devine's former French Quarter which was flattened by the global financial crisis in 2008.
Carrington Tower will be Sunland's first foray in the Queensland residential market since the completion of Q1 and Circle on Cavill at Surfers Paradise almost five years ago. Sunland Group managing director Sahba Abedian has hailed the design by Wood/Marsh as the developer's finest piece of architecture to be produced in the company's 27 years.
The facade of Carrington Tower will flow down to create a canopy over the lobby.
"We will be looking to create a very sculptural, iconographic tower that will really mark the entry into Brisbane from the southside of the city.
"It's a curvilinear building that really personifies the feminine form. If you look at the building it actually drapes out at the base that is not dissimilar to a beautiful dress - that's really the intent behind the tower."
Mr Abedian said he was confident Brisbane City Council would approve the tower by mid-2011, as it could potentially have an unprecedented amount of innovative sustainable design features, including solar panels incorporated into the louvres and blinds to capture and reuse energy.
"As we know the Baby Boomers are moving into retirement and lifestyle choices are changing ... and we hope to cater for these individuals," Mr Abedian said.
If approved by the council, Carrington Tower will be one of only a few buildings in Brisbane, including Riparian and The Grosvenor, designed for owner-occupiers. Mr Abedian said Carrington Tower would boast of the facilities of a hotel, including a 24-hour concierge.
"We believe there is strong demand for these environments," he said.
One-bedroom apartments with a study are expected to sell for about $500,000 and sub-penthouses $3 million.
Although Harry Triguboff's twin-tower residential development on Herschell and Adelaide streets is near completion and the abandoned Vision tower site on Mary Street may also be resurrected by developers Billbergia, Mr Abedian said he was confident there was room in the Brisbane market for Carrington Tower.
"We have a strong track record and we also have a very strong client base that I have no doubt will be very excited when we launch this project," Mr Abedian said.
"The testament of our capabilities is the proof of our projects through from Q1 to Circle on Cavill and Palazzo Versace."
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Real Estate Photography
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Auctions Today
"Ray White CBD residential principal Brendan Tutt said demand for property in and around the city had remained strong and there was a shortage of supply.
“The best time to sell is when demand exceeds supply,” he said. “And that’s what the situation is at the moment.”"
Friday, July 30, 2010
Australian House Prices Fall
"Aussie Dwelling Values Fall After 17 Consecutive Monthly Gains |
30 July 2010 RP Data – Rismark Home Value Index Release
"Despite the recent moderation in capital gains, the risk of a dramatic decline in Australian dwelling values remains remote. According to Mr Lawless, “As the RBA has independently confirmed, arguments in favour of house price “bubbles” remain, in my opinion, overstated. Australia’s housing market has a structural shortage of roughly 200,000 homes, which has been substantiated by the National Housing Supply Council. While the inventory of unsold homes has risen of late, our Market Activity Index suggests that new listings activity will slow over the coming months. And although average time on market and vendor discounting have also expanded with the weaker conditions, these remain in line with historically reasonable levels.” “If we saw blow-outs in average time on market, re-listings, and vendor discounting, it would set off a few alarm bells. This, however, is not currently the case” Mr Lawless said." Brisbane apartment prices did ok. Brisbane Apartments - medium prices Month of June (indicative) - up 1.2% Quarter - up 1.9% Year to Date - up 5.7% Year on Year - up 5.9% Medium price over quarter - settled sales - $380,000 Brisbane Apartments - medium prices Month of May - up 0.9% Quarter - up 1.6% Year to Date - up 4.5% Year on Year - up 7.9% |
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
New Vision Owner
Originally scheduled for completion in May 2012, Vision is a landmark development of a 5,478sqm site fronting Mary and Margaret Streets in the Brisbane CBD. The original designs included basement car parking, three levels of retail, 15 levels of office space, two observation decks and 53 levels of residential apartments.
“At this stage it is unclear whether the purchaser will build the original planned development. We will endeavour to obtain details from the purchaser with regard to their future intentions for the site and will provide further details to all stakeholders as these become available,” Campbell says.
The sale was negotiated by Jeff Dolan from Colliers International and Damian Winterburn from CapLand Real Estate Advisors, who jointly managed the sale process after receiving in excess of 10 offers.
Impacted by future development
Sunday, July 25, 2010
North Quay





This should be compared with Evolution, which is the nearest apartment building of similar age. Evolution is not yet sold out, and two bedroom apartments that originally sold off-the-plan in Evolution for $650,000 range and now listed for sale in the $550,000 range.
Parklands at Sherwood Update

The unique Pradella development at Sherwood, "Parklands at Sherwood" has about 22 apartments remaining for sale. Stages 1 and 2 completed and settled last year. It is rumoured that Stage 3 apartments will start being sold off-the-plan this year. All North facing (parkview) 2 bedroom apartments have sold out. The village green view apartments will have a better aspect once Stage 3 is complete.
Two bedroom apartments
1. Two bedroom, 2 bath, plus large multipurpose room. 95 sqm internal plus 17 sqm balcony, for a total of 112 sqm, ground floor - $519,000
2. Two bedroom, 2 bath, separate laundry, large living room, 2 car parks and 2 storage cages, ground floor corner apartment - 91 sqm internal and 29 sqm balcony for a total of 120 sqm - $535,000
3. Two bedroom, 2 bath, top floor, 2 car parks, 83 sqm internal and 14 sqm balconey = 97 sqm total for $515,000
Three bedroom apartments
4. Three bed, 2 bath, separate meals area, separate laundry, overlooking parklands, corner apartment 117 sqm internal, 24 sqm balcony - $685,000.
5. Three bed, 2 bath, separate meals area, separate laundry, top floor, overlooking parklands, corner apartment 118 sqm internal, 31 sqm balcony, 150 sqm for - $695,000.
Sunland in Alice



What looks like an Alice in Wonderland building, we have Sunland filing a Development Approval for a 44 Level residential tower in Alice Street. Proposed 233 apartments, from 1 to 4 bedrooms each. They look larger than is typical in Brisbane new developments these days. (Sunland's Circle on Cavill development had large apartments too.) Located at 140 Alice Street, next door to Quay West, on the Carrington site.
McLachlan & Ann
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Montague West End Pricing
Level 11 (top floor) - 1 bedroom 1 car
Area: 69sqm total (53 sqm internal) plus balcony. The bedroom in internal with no windows. Kitchen is in hallway (galley kitchen). No laundry. Small -- keep in mind that a typical dulux hotel room is about 40 sqm.
Price $400,000
North facing with views
Similar floor plan on ground floor with courtyard
Total Area: 70sqm
Price $360,000
But there are even smaller apartments than this!
For example, a 1 bed 1 car apartment on level 2 is listed at $315,000
Area 48 sqm internal plus 6 sqm balcony for a grand total of 54sqm. This is a room, not an apartment!
A larger apartment, 1 bedroom, on level 8 is listed at $420,000.
This is 57 sqm internal, plus 20 sqm balcony, for a total of 77 sqm. The laundry is on the balcony.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Station 16 - South Brisbane
West End - Montague
Unfair "off-the-plan" contracts
"People who buy properties off the plan will have greater protection from developers who wish to make last-minute changes to homes such as switching the light fittings or reducing precious floor space.
Property lawyers say new legislation about unfair contract terms could leave some developers exposed to contract terminations if they neglect to review their purchase agreements.
Common clauses in off-the-plan contracts allow developers to alter the size of the dwelling by up to 5 per cent or change inclusions and fittings without the purchaser's consent."
See SMH
"This means that a number of usual clauses in off-the-plan contracts, which allow flexibility in developing the site, may infringe the restriction on unfair terms. For example, “no objection” clauses, where the buyer cannot object to changes to the building, the lot or the scheme, or unilateral rights to terminate in favour of the developer, may be unfair to buyers and therefore void. Developers need to be careful that including such clauses does not create a “significant imbalance” in the parties’ rights and obligations, that the clauses are reasonably necessary to protect the developer’s interests, and that they do not cause detriment to the buyer if a term was relied upon. Where these types of clauses are to be included, developers will need to include provisions to support the necessity to include such clauses (such as a financier’s requirements or changing council requirements)."
See Legal Alert